Kartvelian Cultic Toponyms in Present-Day North Ossetia

Authors

  • Omar Begoidze Ilia State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32859/kadmos/17/61-87

Keywords:

Kartvelian, Ossetic, cult, toponymy, etymology

Abstract

The religious traditions of the Ossetes are a blend of ancient Caucasian beliefs, Iranian influences, Christianity, and Islam. The most prominent are the elements of Caucasian origin, much like those of neighboring groups. Toponymy acts as a historical record, revealing information about past cultures and religions. An abundance of toponyms with religious connotations helps identify significant shrines and deities worshipped in a region. This research focuses on toponyms of Kartvelian (Georgian) origin in North Ossetia. Existing research by Ossetic and Georgian scholars has identified Kartvelian religious vocabulary in Dvaleti toponymy. However, their focus has been limited, paying less attention to Kartvelian religious toponyms beyond said region. Thus, this article explores the Kartvelian cultic toponymy of a wider area, including the Alagir and Digoria regions.

The presence of these toponyms suggests a shared belief system between the Ossetian population and their Kartvelian neighbors.

This study employs qualitative research methods, including content analysis of existing literature, and ethnographic materials from the local population. Due to limitations on fieldwork, the study relies on toponymic data from previous research, particularly A. Tsagaeva's work. Additionally, the comparative method of historical linguistics is used to compare toponyms with Kartvelian vocabulary.

The article discusses specific examples of toponyms with religious meaning across North Ossetia. These toponyms share clear connections with Georgian deities, holidays, and religious terms, demonstrating the continuity and duration of cultural interaction between the regions.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-16

How to Cite

Begoidze, O. (2025). Kartvelian Cultic Toponyms in Present-Day North Ossetia. Kadmos. A Journal of the Humanities, (17), 61–87. https://doi.org/10.32859/kadmos/17/61-87